Week 2 in Stockholm: Telecom regulators advance change initiatives
Week Two of the 8th iPRIS Cohort in Stockholm, Sweden, was successfully completed from 20 - 24 April. Telecom experts from Liberia Telecommunications Authority(LTA), Information and Communications Technologies Authority (ICTA), Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN), National Communications Authority (NatCA), Tanzania Communications Regulatory Authority (TCRA), Postal & Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe (POTRAZ), advanced from foundational concepts into applied strategies for inclusive digital transformation. The sessions built on Week One’s systems thinking and institutional frameworks, moving into practical discussions on harmonisation, broadband mapping, spectrum management, project evaluation, and regional collaboration.
According to GSMA (2024) mobile broadband coverage in Sub‑Saharan Africa now reaches over 87% of the population, showing remarkable progress in infrastructure expansion across the region, reflecting significant progress in infrastructure expansion. The challenge ahead lies in translating this coverage into affordable access and meaningful usage, a task that requires strong regulatory capacity and innovative policy design.

Throughout the week, experts from iPRIS implementing partners, including the Swedish Program for ICT in Developing Regions (SPIDER) and the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (PTS), guided participants through interactive exchanges and case studies. Highlights included:
- Regional harmonisation efforts, with CRASA, WATRA, and EACO sharing lessons from postal quality of service projects, roaming agreements, and ICT data banks.
- Broadband mapping and data‑driven planning, showcasing Sweden’s granular address‑level model as a benchmark for measuring coverage and usage gaps.
- Spectrum management and transparency, emphasising allocation for societal benefit and the importance of openness in regulatory decisions.
- Project evaluation through the MEAL framework (Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, and Learning), enabling participants to refine Change Initiatives with clear outputs, outcomes, and impacts.
- Private‑sector insights from Ernst & Young (EY), reinforcing the role of structured evaluation, risk management, and transparent reporting in sustaining institutional credibility.
By weaving together technical detail, regional experience, and practical project design, Week Two reinforced that effective regulation is not only about frameworks and policies but also about execution, accountability, and collaboration across sectors.
Day 1: Protecting users and embedding inclusion
Lisa Gurner of PTS walked the cohort through the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), explaining how its scope has expanded beyond traditional consumer protection. Vulnerable groups such as small enterprises, non‑profits, and citizens with limited digital literacy are now explicitly considered. This shift reflects a recognition that digital inclusion is not just about access, but about ensuring fairness and safety for those least able to navigate complex markets. She emphasised that regulation must evolve with society’s needs.

Her framing encouraged participants to think about their own national contexts: who is left behind, and how can regulators extend protection without stifling innovation?
In the afternoon, the conversation then moved to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), led by Caroline Wamala and Malena Liendholm Ndounou of SPIDER. They challenged regulators to look inward, stressing that institutional culture shapes external outcomes.

This provocation sparked candid reflections. Participants discussed how unconscious bias within regulatory bodies can filter into policy decisions, whether in licensing, consumer protection, or enforcement. The facilitators illustrated this with global examples such as Estonia’s secure digital ID system, which empowers elderly citizens to access services confidently, and Kenya’s cybersecurity frameworks, which build trust among users who might otherwise be excluded.
Day 2: Refining change initiatives

On the second day, the emphasis shifted from external frameworks to refining each NRA’s Change Initiative. Country teams sat down with European experts to discuss their ideas relating them to the practical realities and received targeted feedback on design, scope, and feasibility. These discussions helped participants sharpen their project logic and identify where adjustments were needed. The dialogue was constructive, with experts encouraging teams to embed lessons from the previous sessions.
DAY 3: Industry perspectives from Ericsson

On the third day, the cohort stepped out of the seminar room and into industry practice with a field visit to Ericsson. The experience offered a first‑hand look at how private‑sector actors approach connectivity, resilience, and innovation. Participants were introduced to demonstrations of emerging technologies, from next‑generation mobile networks to solutions designed to strengthen reliability in underserved areas. The visit emphasised the interplay between regulation and market development.
Day 4: Harmonisation, broadband mapping, and spectrum management
Day four marked a turning point in the program, as the cohort moved into the week's most technical discussions. Moderated by Katerina Schyberg, the sessions combined European regulatory experience with African perspectives, showing how harmonisation, broadband mapping, and spectrum management are not abstract policy debates but practical tools for expanding opportunity and building trust in digital systems.
Harmonisation and technology neutrality
Bo Andersson from PTS emphasised the need for EU harmonisation, stating that fragmented implementation hinders innovation and imposes burdens on regulators.

The proposed Digital Networks Act was discussed as a way to centralise regulation, though concerns about clarity and national sovereignty in spectrum authorisation remained. African regulators highlighted their challenge of being “technology receivers” and stressed the importance of participating actively in global standard‑setting to protect consumers.
Broadband mapping as a tool for inclusion
The discussion then shifted to broadband mapping, where Sweden’s model was presented by Andreas Wigren and Jens Ingman. They explained that PTS collects granular address‑level data from hundreds of operators, enabling precise measurement of coverage and progress toward national targets. They urged regulators to think beyond national silos and adopt frameworks that allow technology to evolve freely.


Participants compared their own practices, noting gaps in usage data and the need for more detailed household‑level information.
Spectrum Management and Transparency
The day concluded with a spectrum management session led by Amela Hatibovic Sehic, Gustav Lenninger, and Fredrik Johansson. They outlined Sweden’s framework for licensing, supervision, and auctions, emphasising strategies such as international harmonisation, spectrum planning, rights of use, and sharing.
Amela Hatibovic Sehic underscored the principle that “spectrum must be allocated to maximise benefit for society, not just profit for the treasury.”
Gustav Lenninger reinforced the importance of transparency, noting that openness in licensing decisions builds trust and encourages innovation.
Examples of refarming, such as reallocating the 700 MHz band from television to mobile, illustrated how regulators adapt to evolving needs. Auctions were described not as revenue‑generating exercises but as mechanisms to promote competition, coverage, and innovation.

Day 5: Regional Dialogue and Project Refinement
Day five brought together regional perspectives, project evaluation, and private‑sector insights. The morning opened with a session led by Malena Liedholm, who introduced the MEAL framework (Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, and Learning) as a practical tool for refining Change Initiatives. She guided participants to see evaluation not as a static report but as a continuous learning process that strengthens impact.

With this basis, the NRAs applied the MEAL lens to their project plans, clarifying outputs, outcomes, and impacts while testing assumptions and embedding accountability structures.
Building on this foundation, representatives from the Regional Regulatory Organisations (RROs), CRASA, WATRA, and EACO shared lessons from harmonisation projects. These included CRASA’s work on postal quality of service frameworks, WATRA’s efforts to establish roaming agreements across West Africa, and EACO’s initiative to build an ICT data bank for the East African region. By sharing harmonisation projects, CRASA demonstrated that collective approaches not only strengthen service quality but also give regulators the tools to engage stakeholders with credibility. Together, these examples showed how regional collaboration strengthens national capacity and provides tested models for evidence‑based decision‑making.

The day closed with a brief visit to Ernst & Young (EY), offering a private‑sector perspective on governance and accountability.
From knowledge-exchange to Change Initiatives
Week 2 highlighted that effective regulation is built on evidence, accountability, and collaboration through frameworks such as MEAL, regional harmonisation projects, and private‑sector perspectives on governance. The cohort’s progress shows that regulators are not only absorbing concepts but actively applying them to their own initiatives.
Collaboration emerged as a central theme, reminding participants that regional progress depends on collective responsibility.

This forward‑looking perspective highlights the urgency of translating frameworks into enforceable action. Building on this momentum, Week 3 will be dedicated to intensive work on the NRA change initiatives and the Way Forward session. These sessions will not only refine Change Initiatives but will also mark the end of the first phase of the iPRIS cycle for the 8th cohort.
iPRIS is coordinated and implemented by SPIDER in strategic and technical partnership with the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (PTS) and Institut luxembourgeois de régulation (ILR), as well as ARTAC, CRASA, EACO, and WATRA.
iPRIS is funded by the European Union, Sweden, and Luxembourg as part of the Team Europe Initiative “D4D for Digital Economy and Society in Sub-Saharan Africa” (Code: 001).





































































